<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Posts in the category: keywords</title>
 <link>http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/keywords</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Using Managing News to Trace a Story Back to Its Source</title>
 <link>http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/2008/jun/03/using-managing-news-trace-a-story-back-its-source</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I heard the news this morning that Hillary Clinton was dropping out of the Democratic primary race. As soon as I could, I went to Managing News where I’m tracking news about the candidates to see what was happening. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right away I noticed that one keyword in particular received a huge spike: the Associated Press. Here’s a screenshot showing the jump in mentions of the AP today compared to the last two weeks in the political news I’m tracking. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3029/2548808735_2318804920_o.png&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3029/2548808735_a79ca12f7a.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The AP had been mentioned in about 0.5% of the stories pulled in by Managing News over the last two weeks. Today that figure jumped over ten-fold to 5.3%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So why was there suddenly so much traffic around the Associated Press? The AP was reporting that Clinton will concede the nomination to Obama this evening after the results come in from Montana and South Dakota, and a lot of other sources were citing them on this. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That story drew an immediate retraction from Clinton campaign spokesperson Terry McAuliffe (who, as you can see shown in blue below, saw his own bump in mentions today).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/2008/jun/03/using-managing-news-trace-a-story-back-its-source#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/2008-election">2008 election</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/clinton">clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/graphing">graphing</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/keywords">keywords</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/obama">obama</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/politics">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/source">source</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AJ Herrmann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">16 at http://preview.managingnews.com/blog</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>War vs. War: Funny Keyword Accuracy</title>
 <link>http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/2008/apr/16/war-vs-war-keyword-accuracy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Last week I spent some time reviewing the accuracy of our keyword tracking on one of our development versions of Managing News. We&#039;ve been testing auto tagging engines, from our internal artificial intelligence system and more recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://developer.opencalais.com/&quot;&gt;Calais&lt;/a&gt; (formally known as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clearforest.com/&quot;&gt;ClearForest&lt;/a&gt; before Reuters bought it last year) to figure out what gives us the most accurate keywords. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I decided to look at some political candidates in the south to see whether or not they were being associated with the Iraq war. Of course, good and accurate tracking of an issue like this also means looking at how the media uses the word &quot;war&quot; with current events. So now for your moment of Zen, the most ridiculous find of the day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3119/2448589649_51d3e30f79.jpg?v=0&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;+1 for improved accuracy. However, my apologies go out to all the CNN viewers who had to watch that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/2008/apr/16/war-vs-war-keyword-accuracy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/accuracy">accuracy</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/iraq-war">Iraq war</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/keywords">keywords</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/media-bias">media bias</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/moment-zen">moment of Zen</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/politics">politics</category>
 <category domain="http://preview.managingnews.com/blog/category/keywords/tagging">tagging</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Gundersen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">9 at http://preview.managingnews.com/blog</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
